The great skill in demand from pundits is not informed perspicacity, but the ability to operate coherently within a given medium, to fill time and space with something plausible. In this world, confident prediction in the Richardson mode is conspicuous and applauded. Firm and slightly controversial positions likewise; and so much better than something well-judged, reliably informed and therefore unremarkable. In the calculus of fame, the more outlandish the apparently plausible view, the better. And it is these views, these pieces of self-promoting propaganda, that stoke our public conversation. Undeclared bias looks tame by comparison. More » |
0 comments:
Post a Comment